<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Bike Of The Future Will Be Here In Another 20 Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://trendsupdates.com/the-bike-of-the-future-will-be-here-in-another-20-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://trendsupdates.com/the-bike-of-the-future-will-be-here-in-another-20-years/</link>
	<description>A trip down the trendy lane</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 00:05:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: what he said</title>
		<link>http://trendsupdates.com/the-bike-of-the-future-will-be-here-in-another-20-years/#comment-9802</link>
		<dc:creator>what he said</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:12:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trendsupdates.com/?p=21540#comment-9802</guid>
		<description>I think its funny how there is only one pixelated image to support all these claims. BS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its funny how there is only one pixelated image to support all these claims. BS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonabike</title>
		<link>http://trendsupdates.com/the-bike-of-the-future-will-be-here-in-another-20-years/#comment-9745</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonabike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trendsupdates.com/?p=21540#comment-9745</guid>
		<description>Techno mash-up collage-o-rama. I am the broken record of critique; hubless rims, inefficient, unstable, hugely increased drag from increased number of bearing points... Assist motor; good... funky bar ends; no need... Addition of needless computerized functions to a commuter bike. Technology is an outcome of human application of knowledge. Adding technology  in the guise of progress is naive. This concept has been done 100 times over; it is not new. Every design student has come up with the same thing. There is a reason it is not made. It does not make sense. Computerized, hubless rimmed bike in the rain?! Think about it. I have built, ridden and field tested bikes and components. Simplicity will win out, always does, always will.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Techno mash-up collage-o-rama. I am the broken record of critique; hubless rims, inefficient, unstable, hugely increased drag from increased number of bearing points&#8230; Assist motor; good&#8230; funky bar ends; no need&#8230; Addition of needless computerized functions to a commuter bike. Technology is an outcome of human application of knowledge. Adding technology  in the guise of progress is naive. This concept has been done 100 times over; it is not new. Every design student has come up with the same thing. There is a reason it is not made. It does not make sense. Computerized, hubless rimmed bike in the rain?! Think about it. I have built, ridden and field tested bikes and components. Simplicity will win out, always does, always will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.223 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-05-10 11:49:51 -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->
