Comments on: What Exactly Do Madhur Bhandarkar’s Films Mean?

By: Jaiyant Cavale

Jaiyant Cavale — Fri, 28 Nov 2008 19:38:28 +0000

Madhur Bhandarkar according to me is banal and a pseudo intellectual. He has not only portrayed glam industry in a poor light but has also succeeded in making the snug Indian middle class feel more self righteous than they ever were. What we need are courageous movie makers who do justice to the topics of LGBT, prostitution, religion, couch casting etc. We must remember that these issues are not limited to the glamour industry and can be as you say, found in the lower middle class as well. And these are not even issues, just a part of humanity. I can’t say more but can vehemently state that he is a great businessmen and knows how to attract the smug middle classes to watch his mundane and tasteless movies.

By: Saba

Saba — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:05:46 +0000

Thank you for the response Neo. I respect your POV and would appreciate if you respected mine too. I do agree that films in commercial cinema are not documentaries but all I am asking for is responsibility on the part of the director.
Like you many others too pick up the newspaper everyday, and when they turn to Page 3 they wonder what the crap is written there. Do not misunderstand me as the messiah of the high class, all I’m saying is thet Page 3 may not be important to you but it is important for business. People form business and social associations through parties and new entreprenuers get introduced likewise. At the same time, I do maintain that the smiling faces you see may not be actual smiles. It could be a whole act.
Now coming to the personal attack. Well, since you brought it up I am forced to reply that I never did any stories on the subjects you mentioned because I did not encounter them.
As for my questioning Bhandarkar’s films. Well, we live in a free world and I have the right to disagree and likewise for you.
A film is truly the director’s canvas. He or she has the right to paint it any way he or she likes. But at the same time I maintain, he or she should place the strokes responsibily. My issue is with the blatant generalisation. And as far as Karan Johar and Sanjay Leela Bhansali go, their films are in a different league altogether. Bhandarkar’s films promise a realistic premise. By the way, I saw ‘Fashion’ and Bhandarkar himself makes a fleeting appearance there with the claim for being a “realistic filmmaker”(and I quote from the film). Plus, just including the wardrobe malfuction and Geetanjali Nagpal rip-offs do not make ‘Fashion’ a realistic film. Also, the treatment meted out to the gay community in the same movie is degrading and limited to stereotypes alone.
I wish Bhandarkar would learn from the likes of Shyam Benegal when it comes to handling societal panaromas.
All that said, thank you for your standpoint. Keep reading.

By: Neo

Neo — Sat, 01 Nov 2008 19:21:25 +0000

I think we enjoy Madhur’s movies cos they are not the same as tons of others that have nothing to say beyond the same love story put in a different sense. Bcos it is so close to reality, it is loved. A movie director has no obligation to show everything in his movie. If he wishes to show a certain sect or community in certain POV, then it is up to him totally to ignore the other side. It is a movie, not a work or historical accuracy or a journalistic piece in reality and facts. I loved ‘Page 3′ cos each day i pick up the paper and wonder why that crap is actually in there. The movie showed another side of the whole Page 3 story.
Conversely i could question you that despite being a Page 3 journalist for whatever time you have been, as you claim, how many, if ever, stories did you cover about homosexuality, pedophilia, drugs, abuse and others in that section?? I’m guessing not often enough, probably never. So how would that put you in a position to question someone else covering a certain angle?
what about Traffic Signal? Ever watched?
You say, “I don’t know, whether it is fair to pin down a particular group and show only a half-truth as the complete truth.”
I would like to know where Madhur actually told that his movies showed ‘Complete Truth’. There is no movie in the world that claims to do so cos directors are artists and they like to paint the screen the way they wish. What about the outlandish Karan Johar? Over-indulgent Sanjay Leela Bhansali? t this rate, every director is the same.